- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 13:43:38 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
· Action CMN: Write a short paragraph explaining why we need a WCAG 2.0 (including why we are moving from 14 to 6 guidelines). This paragraph will be integrated into the introduction of WCAG 2.0. About to do this in a seperate email. · Action CMN: Work with Katie on DATABASE for techniques and publication. In progress. · Action CMN: Post SVG techniques to the list. Done - seperate mail. · Action CMN: Look up "constraint-based CSS". Outstanding · Action CMN: Take this requirement to the ATAG WG - provide an annotated wcag 2.0 with information about facility of implementing requirements in tools. Does this mean that ATAG should come back with something that says whether we think we can write techniques better based on WCAG 2? (in any case, it is outstanding). Charles McCN
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2000 13:43:38 UTC