- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 08:33:36 -0600
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote: > Color names also vary from one platform to another....Some browsers have > chosen to support additional color names, but there is no definite list. > Therefore, you should: use numbers, not names, for colors . Color names may > seem friendlier than the somewhat cryptic RGB notation introduced in the > previous chapter, but the Web has yet to see the ultimate list of color names > that work on all platforms. Color numbers, on the other hand, can easily be > interpreted by any browser. Being the original commentator, I hope it's OK to jump back in. It seems to me, from context, the recommendation is merely to use numbers when the color is not specified by the spec. I think he's simply trying to avoid a browser-tag-like problem where certain browsers implement extra colors and others don't, causing incompatibility. However, as long as you use one in the spec, it seems like you're ok, no? -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Sunday, 31 December 2000 08:35:37 UTC