- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:10:33 -0800
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@opendesign.com> (by way of Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>)
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 01:31 PM 12/18/2000 , Cynthia Shelly wrote: >If we ask people to point to the official one, we can change it if we need >to. If we encourage people to make local copies, then old versions will >hang around forever. If we ask people to point to the official one then we are asking for a great amount of load on W3C servers, we are asking for people to potentially violate firewalls to use the logo, and we are making it unusable in situations which are not directly web connected. That's silly, to me, and it doesn't fit with any other W3C logo usage. Note that other W3C logos can be used, say, on boxes of software. There's no concern about "old versions being around forever" and in fact that's not necessarily a bad thing. In what kind of scenario would we change the logo, and why wouldn't we want the old one to persist? --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, Edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ What's on my bookshelf? http://kynn.com/books/
Received on Monday, 18 December 2000 18:49:02 UTC