- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:14:59 -0500
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
As discussed in our last call, we're going to create some "case law", i.e. some examples where we can come to a consensus on acceptability. Per my action item, I've posted three examples at. http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday/wai/texteg/ We can discuss this in the context of WCAG 1.0 or 2.0. They represent the "return policy" of a hypothetical web site. All use special fonts or effects. In example 1, All loops are colored yellow. For example, the inside of the loop at the top of the letter P is colored yellow. This effect cannot be produced by CSS or other currently available technology. Is it therefore acceptable to present this text as an image? In example 2, the dots of the i's are two pixels wide instead of one pixel wide (the default for Times Roman). This effect cannot be produced by CSS or other currently available technology. Is it therefore acceptable to present this text as an image? In example 3, the area of text appears to bulge up, three dimensionally, from the center. Acceptable? These are extreme examples, but I'm not trying to be flippant: I'm trying to get examples that cut to any differences of opinion we may have. If this discussion belongs in the compliance discussion we can of course postpone it till then. Len p.s. To give a hint of my own opinion: the acceptability of example three depends on its purpose... as I've tried to argue in general... but so far to no avail... -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Monday, 18 December 2000 17:15:12 UTC