public-html@w3.org from June 2007 by date

Saturday, 30 June 2007

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Bill Mason
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Bill Mason
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned David Choi
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Ian Hickson
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Lachlan Hunt
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Daniel Schattenkirchner
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Ben Boyle
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Steven Faulkner
[html] HTML elements index Jens Meiert
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Rene Saarsoo
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
html 5 and accessibility issue aurelien levy
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Anne van Kesteren
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Joshue O Connor
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Henri Sivonen
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Thomas Broyer
LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Wiki page for style attribute Dannii
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Michael A. Puls II
Re: LONGDESC Wiki Page Ian Hickson
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
LONGDESC Wiki Page Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Patrick Garies
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Patrick Garies

Friday, 29 June 2007

Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ian Hickson
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Rene Saarsoo
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Henri Sivonen
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ian Hickson
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Joshue O Connor
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Lachlan Hunt
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Dan Connolly
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Dan Connolly
some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Dan Connolly
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Sierk Bornemann
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Joshue O Connor
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Nathan Youngman
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Evans, Donald
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Jon Gunderson
Re: [whatwg] XMLHttpRequest for missing file Thomas Broyer
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Joshue O Connor
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Joshue O Connor
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Jason White
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Ben Boyle
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Anne van Kesteren
Re: [A11y] Using Longdesc, will it fly? Joshue O Connor
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] James Graham
Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Karl Dubost
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft gonchuki

Thursday, 28 June 2007

RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Alejandro Fernández + MEDIADVANCED
RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Alejandro Fernández + MEDIADVANCED
SURVEY: Re: HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? Dan Connolly
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Adam Nash
HTML5 and AT integration (was: Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals) Henri Sivonen
Re: Dates in HTML 5 liorean
Re: Dates in HTML 5 liorean
Re: Dates in HTML 5 liorean
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Robert Burns
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Thomas Broyer
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Thomas Broyer
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals gonchuki
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Thomas Broyer
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Murray Maloney
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: PWDs do NOT crave catering, but EQUAL access Gregory J. Rosmaita
PWDs do NOT crave catering, but EQUAL access [was: Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listen] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Jirka Kosek
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals paul haine
Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
Re: How to productively contribute Laura Carlson
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Video Descriptions Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Olivier GENDRIN
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Sander Tekelenburg

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Re: Dates in HTML 5 Rob Marshall

Thursday, 28 June 2007

Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Call Center-Asistan
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") scott lewis
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Dave Singer
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Video Descriptions (Was: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened) Smylers
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") scott lewis
Re: coordinating with WAI Simon Pieters
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Philip TAYLOR
RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Gavin Pearce
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Philip TAYLOR

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Alastair Campbell

Thursday, 28 June 2007

Re: About dropping the style attribute Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Lachlan Hunt
coordinating with WAI Karl Dubost
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Patrick Garies
Re: How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Martijn
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Lachlan Hunt
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Karl Dubost
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Adam Nash
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Charles McCathieNevile
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Channy Yun
Re: How to productively contribute Robert Burns

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Cameron McCormack
Re: How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Karl Dubost
Re: Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? Karl Dubost
Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
Re: How to productively contribute Robert Burns
Re: Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? Henri Sivonen
Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? scott lewis
Re: How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaeresis vs umlaut] Thomas Broyer
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Thomas Broyer
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
Re: About dropping the style attribute Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: About dropping the style attribute Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Simon Pieters
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] William Loughborough
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
Re: How to productively contribute Robert Burns
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Sander van Lambalgen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Robert Burns

Tuesday, 26 June 2007

Dates in HTML 5 Simon Grant

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Robert Burns

Tuesday, 26 June 2007

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Channy Yun
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Channy Yun
Re: About dropping the style attribute Ara Pehlivanian
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gijs Kruitbosch
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? michael lawley
RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Simon Pieters
Re: About dropping the style attribute Daniel Glazman
Re: About dropping the style attribute Shane Thacker
RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Don Raikes
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] William Loughborough
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Josh Sled
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> Sander Tekelenburg
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Smylers
Re: About dropping the style attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jon Barnett
Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> Lachlan Hunt
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Thomas Broyer
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Anne van Kesteren
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Sylvain Eliade
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Laura Carlson
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Henri Sivonen
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Sylvain Eliade
Re: difference between @alt and @title Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Henri Sivonen
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Simon Pieters
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Raphael Champeimont (Almacha)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Ben Boyle
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Ben Boyle
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Ben Boyle
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Ben Boyle

Tuesday, 26 June 2007

Re: About dropping the style attribute Craig Francis

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Nicolas LE GALL
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: About dropping the style attribute Karl Dubost
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About dropping the style attribute Patrick Garies
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Lachlan Hunt
Re: About dropping the style attribute Daniel Glazman
Re: About dropping the style attribute Dannii
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Lachlan Hunt
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Daniel Glazman
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Karl Dubost
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Michael A. Puls II
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Karl Dubost
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Arun

Tuesday, 26 June 2007

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Dylan Smith
Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Thomas Broyer
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] William Loughborough
How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Smylers
Re: About dropping the style attribute Daniel Glazman
Re: difference between @alt and @title [was RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Laura Carlson
Re: difference between @alt and @title [was RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Monika Trebo
Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Jirka Kosek
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Laura Carlson
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Jirka Kosek

Monday, 25 June 2007

Tuesday, 26 June 2007

Re: About dropping the style attribute James Craig
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Lachlan Hunt
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Lachlan Hunt
SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Laura Carlson
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
HTML Design Principles to WD? Anne van Kesteren
Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Smylers
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Smylers
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
Re: Nested browsing context (was: fear of "invisible metadata") Thomas Broyer
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Anne van Kesteren
RE: dropping longdesc attribute DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
Re: About dropping the style attribute Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Jirka Kosek
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: sharing the burden: authors and authoring tools Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Robert Burns
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Anne van Kesteren
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Ben Boyle
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Lachlan Hunt
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Thomas Broyer
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] scott lewis
Re: The point of XHTML 2 Robert Burns
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Karl Dubost
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Doug Schepers
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] William Loughborough
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Karl Dubost
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Doug Schepers
Re: BarCamp like for the HTML WG. Sam Ruby
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Karl Dubost
BarCamp like for the HTML WG. Karl Dubost
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Monika Trebo

Monday, 25 June 2007

Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Laura Carlson
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Philip & Le Khanh
Re: The point of XHTML 2 Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
sharing the burden: authors and authoring tools Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Dan Connolly
addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Gregory J. Rosmaita
The point of XHTML 2 Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Dan Connolly
Re: About dropping the style attribute Henri Sivonen
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
Re: About dropping the style attribute Jon Barnett
3.14.13. The area element Marco Neumann
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] John Foliot
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Maurice Carey
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Maurice Carey
Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
Re: "placeholder link" scott lewis
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maurice Carey
Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] scott lewis
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: the fallicy of the term "fallback content" David Poehlman
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: About dropping the style attribute Bruce Lawson
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: "placeholder link" scott lewis
Re: "placeholder link" Lachlan Hunt
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
the fallicy of the term "fallback content" Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Dan Connolly
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Eric Eggert
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" gonchuki
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] gonchuki
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Dan Connolly
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Simon Pieters
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (comments mailing list) Dan Connolly
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Dan Connolly
Re: "placeholder link" Simon Pieters
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Charles McCathieNevile
Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Simon Pieters
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Martijn
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Henri Sivonen
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) scott lewis
Re: "placeholder link" Ben Boyle
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Mark Birbeck
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Bill Mason
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Ian Hickson
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Julian Reschke
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Maciej Stachowiak
UA requirements vs. document conformance (Was: Re: Choosing name for XML serialization) Henri Sivonen
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Ian Hickson
Re: "placeholder link" Simon Pieters
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Thomas Broyer
A couple of HTML5 editorial comments Cameron McCormack
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Julian Reschke
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Ian Hickson
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Bill Mason
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Julian Reschke
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Charles McCathieNevile
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Karl Dubost
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Karl Dubost
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 24 June 2007

Some issues [was: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"?] Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG)

Monday, 25 June 2007

Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Karl Dubost
Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Karl Dubost
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Bill Mason
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Bill Mason

Sunday, 24 June 2007

Re: Seeking test data with bogus byte sequences from Henri Sivonen on 2007-06-19 (public-html@w3.org from June 2007) Martin Duerst

Monday, 25 June 2007

Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 24 June 2007

Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Mark Birbeck
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: "placeholder link" Lachlan Hunt
Re: "placeholder link" (was HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: About dropping the style attribute Maciej Stachowiak
Re: About dropping the style attribute Robert Burns
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Robert Burns
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Mark Birbeck
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Robert Burns
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Craig Francis
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Craig Francis
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Kornel Lesinski
usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: About dropping the style attribute Sam Ruby
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Gregory J. Rosmaita
what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Simon Pieters
danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Robert Burns
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Gregory J. Rosmaita
rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Johannes Lichtenberger
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Jeff Schiller
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Martijn
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Lachlan Hunt
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Johannes Lichtenberger
Re: About dropping the style attribute Patrick Garies
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Tom Morris
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Kornel Lesinski
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Craig Francis
Typo. correction : relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices Philip & Le Khanh
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Kornel Lesinski
Re: About dropping the style attribute Craig Francis
Re: About dropping the style attribute Julian Reschke
Re: About dropping the style attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Anne van Kesteren
Re: About dropping the style attribute Håkon Wium Lie
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) liorean
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4" cadunn
Re: About dropping the style attribute Ben Boyle
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Ben Boyle

Saturday, 23 June 2007

Re: About dropping the style attribute Craig Francis
About dropping the style attribute Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown

Friday, 22 June 2007

Re: dropping longdesc attribute Monika Trebo

Saturday, 23 June 2007

Re: figures, images and fallback content (was: fear of "invisible metadata") Robert Burns
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Tom Morris
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dimitri Glazkov
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Dan Connolly
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Anne van Kesteren
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Craig Francis
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Craig Francis
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Steven Faulkner
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Ian Hickson
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Steven Faulkner
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dannii
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Lachlan Hunt
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Steven Faulkner
figures, images and fallback content (was: fear of "invisible metadata") Ben Boyle
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Lachlan Hunt
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Robert Burns
Re: dropping longdesc attribute scott lewis
Re: dropping longdesc attribute scott lewis
Re: dropping longdesc attribute WebConforme
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle

Friday, 22 June 2007

Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Robert Burns
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ Ian Hickson
Re: Attributes and "Expandos" Ian Hickson
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dan Connolly
Re: Attributes and "Expandos" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Attributes and "Expandos" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Brendan Cullen
Attributes and "Expandos" Travis Leithead
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
On dictature of a language, was: requiring alt attribute, was: fear of "invisible metadata" Dimitri Glazkov
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dimitri Glazkov
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dimitri Glazkov
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Sam Ruby
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ Philip Taylor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: <code type="..."> Maurice Carey
#refs in .../current-work/multipage/ Josh Sled
Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Alexandre Alapetite
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Lachlan Hunt
Re: E-mail subscription and RSS Nikola Mitic
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? David Håsäther
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Simon Pieters
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Ian Hickson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: <code type="..."> Thomas Pike
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Simon Pieters
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? David Håsäther
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip & Le Khanh
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 Mike Brown
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Ian Hickson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Ben Boyle
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Karl Dubost
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Karl Dubost
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ben Boyle
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Karl Dubost
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Karl Dubost
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Alexandre Alapetite
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Sam Ruby
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 21 June 2007

Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Maurice Carey
Re: <code type="..."> Maurice Carey
Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Maurice Carey
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip & Le Khanh
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip & Le Khanh
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Robert Burns
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Horizontal menu-2 Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Stephen Stewart
Re: <code type="..."> liorean
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: dropping longdesc attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Thomas Broyer
[a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
dropping longdesc attribute Laura Carlson
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Roger Johansson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Julian Reschke
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Jirka Kosek
Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc James Graham
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Julian Reschke
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Sander Tekelenburg

Friday, 15 June 2007

Re: 'role' should be property Dmitry Turin

Monday, 11 June 2007

Re[2]: eleding, sag, seribute Dmitry Turin
Re: Horizontal menu-2 Dmitry Turin
Re: Horizontal menu-2 Dmitry Turin
Re: <code type="..."> Dmitry Turin
Re: 'role' should be property Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: WF2, abolish <button type=remove> Dmitry Turin
Re: 'role' should be property Dmitry Turin
Re: WF2, attach hidden xml Dmitry Turin

Thursday, 21 June 2007

Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 20 June 2007

Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Robert Burns
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Ben Boyle
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Olivier GENDRIN
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Karl Dubost
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 19 June 2007

Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" James Graham
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Craig Francis
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" aurélien levy
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
wiki gardening around versioning/doctypes issue Dan Connolly
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Charles McCathieNevile
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip & Le Khanh
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Dan Connolly
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" aurélien levy
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Ian Hickson
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" aurélien levy
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip & Le Khanh
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Ben Boyle
Seeking test data with bogus byte sequences Henri Sivonen
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Henri Sivonen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
[A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Chris Adams
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Chris Adams
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Lachlan Hunt
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Karl Dubost

Monday, 18 June 2007

Re: Scope and obsolescence of other specs (was Re: minor copy edits...) Ian Hickson
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Sam Ruby
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Michael A. Puls II
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Karl Dubost
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Philip & Le Khanh
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Mike Brown
HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
C0 control characters in HTML 5 Mike Brown
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
Scope and obsolescence of other specs (was Re: minor copy edits...) Mike Brown
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] James Graham
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip & Le Khanh
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Dan Connolly
Re: Introducing myself John Foliot
[Fwd: Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Michael A. Puls II
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re: Introducing myself Olivier GENDRIN
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
Re: wiki HTMLTableAccessibility content restored Dan Connolly
Re: Introducing myself Dan Connolly
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Dan Connolly
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Anne van Kesteren
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 Maurice Carey
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Lachlan Hunt
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Anne van Kesteren
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Maurice Carey
fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Subj: Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Maurice Carey
Introducing myself Martyn Haigh
Change in Opera representative Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Allow other doctypes Michael A. Puls II
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft Ian Hickson
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Henri Sivonen
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Laurens Holst
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft Mike Brown
Renaming "writing HTML 8.1" - Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
Re: Allow other doctypes Sean Fraser

Sunday, 17 June 2007

Re: Allow other doctypes Ian Hickson
Re: Allow other doctypes Sean Fraser
Re: Allow other doctypes Michael A. Puls II
Re: Allow other doctypes Ian Hickson
Re: Allow other doctypes Sean Fraser
Re: The term "HTML elements" Simon Pieters
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft Ian Hickson
The term "HTML elements" Mike Brown
The term "HTML documents" Mike Brown
minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft Mike Brown
Re: <tfoot> at the bottom of <table> Joshue O Connor
Re: Allow other doctypes Lachlan Hunt
Re: Allow other doctypes Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Allow other doctypes Ben Boyle
Re: Allow other doctypes Ian Hickson

Saturday, 16 June 2007

Re: Common pool of examples and validation Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Allow other doctypes Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
<tfoot> at the bottom of <table> Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Schematron for testing HTML 5 stricter content model Alexandre Alapetite

Friday, 15 June 2007

Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) Jirka Kosek
Re: HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? Dan Connolly
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) Lee Kowalkowski
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) scott lewis
HTML5 Differences from HTML4 Maurice Carey
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) paul haine
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Anne van Kesteren
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Jens Meiert
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Olivier GENDRIN
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Anne van Kesteren
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Jens Meiert
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Anne van Kesteren
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Jens Meiert
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) Anne van Kesteren
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) Nathan Youngman
Re: What is a "state"? Henri Sivonen
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Michael A. Puls II
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
[doctype] useless/not required or useful/required Karl Dubost
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
Re: What is a "state"? Ben Boyle
Re: What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal

Thursday, 14 June 2007

Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Debi Orton
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Dan Connolly
mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
Re: What is a "state"? Ian Hickson
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Dan Connolly
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) Dan Connolly
Re: mobileOK Basic, overly restrictive tests (was: Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...)) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Martyn Haigh
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Adam Nash
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re:retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (with addendum on id/headers) Joshue O Connor
RE: mobileOK Basic, overly restrictive tests (was: Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...)) Jo Rabin
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Michael A. Puls II
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Timur Mehrvarz
Re: What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Olivier GENDRIN
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
RE: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Jo Rabin
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) Jirka Kosek
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers Anne van Kesteren
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
RE: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...) Jo Rabin
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Henri Sivonen
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers Karl Dubost
mobileOK Basic, overly restrictive tests (was: Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...)) Simon Pieters
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers Henri Sivonen
HTML 5 and conformance checkers Karl Dubost
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 13 June 2007

Offline until 6/25 Chris Wilson
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Dan Connolly
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...) Dan Connolly
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Martijn
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Dan Connolly
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: What is a "state"? Ian Hickson
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Laura Carlson
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Shawn Medero
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Joshue O Connor
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Joshue O Connor
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Jirka Kosek
Re: Subj: Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element James Graham
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Schalk Neethling
Subj: Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Martijn
HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Anne van Kesteren
HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? Arun
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Laurens Holst
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Anne van Kesteren
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re: Common pool of examples and validation L. David Baron
Re: Common pool of examples and validation Henri Sivonen
Re: What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: What is a "state"? Ian Hickson
Re: What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Michael A. Puls II
Re: What is a "state"? Ian Hickson
Re: What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal

Tuesday, 12 June 2007

Re: What is a "state"? Ian Hickson
Re: What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Common pool of examples and validation Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: What is a "state"? Ian Hickson
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (and Note on terminology: Attribute types) Ian Hickson
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Boris Zbarsky
What is a "state"? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Timmy Jose
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Anne van Kesteren
Note on terminology: Attribute types Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Karl Dubost

Monday, 11 June 2007

Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Simon Pieters
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Boris Zbarsky
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Chris Boudy
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes Henri Sivonen
Conceptual modelling of attributes Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Henri Sivonen
RE: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Jo Rabin
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element James Graham
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Maciej Stachowiak
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Ben Boyle
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Laurens Holst

Sunday, 10 June 2007

Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element David Poehlman
retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Gregory J. Rosmaita

Friday, 8 June 2007

Re: Reminder: "What should we publish first?" survey closes today 2007-06-08 Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Reminder: "What should we publish first?" survey closes today 2007-06-08 Dan Connolly
Reminder: "What should we publish first?" survey closes today 2007-06-08 Laura Carlson
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Dan Connolly
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Schalk Neethling
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Shawn Medero
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Laura Carlson
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Anne van Kesteren
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst

Thursday, 7 June 2007

Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Laurens Holst
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Laurens Holst
please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Dan Connolly
volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? Dan Connolly
Re: "Headers Attribute" issue Laura Carlson
Re: 'role' should be property Matthew Raymond
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
open source screen readers [was: Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute)] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Karl Dubost
"Headers Attribute" issue Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 6 June 2007

Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
HTML WG office hours tomorrow (no teleconference) Dan Connolly
Re: 'role' should be property Henri Sivonen
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Ben Mason
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maurice Carey
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Laura Carlson
Re: headers attribute debate Al Gilman
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Laura Carlson
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Laura Carlson
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Laura Carlson
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: headers attribute Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Steven Faulkner
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: 'role' should be property Matthew Raymond
Re: Complex Table Examples Thomas Broyer
Re: Complex Table Examples Anne van Kesteren
Re: Complex Table Examples aurélien levy
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Tuesday, 5 June 2007

Re: Complex Table Examples Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Complex Table Examples Thomas Broyer
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined liorean
wiki HTMLTableAccessibility content restored Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Complex Table Examples Laura Carlson
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined liorean
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Steven Faulkner
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: [Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] Karl Dubost
Re: [Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined liorean
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal

Monday, 4 June 2007

Re: headers attribute Ian Hickson
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Ian Hickson
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Laura Carlson
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: [Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] Bill Mason
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
[Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Extensions to the <base> element GenSephyr
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Steve Faulkner
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them James Graham
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Anne van Kesteren
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> liorean
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Anne van Kesteren
Re: 'role' should be property Dannii
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> Dão Gottwald
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: 'role' should be property Matthew Raymond
Re: 'role' should be property Matthew Raymond
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Laurens Holst
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Anne van Kesteren
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Anne van Kesteren
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Henrik Dvergsdal
JAWS 6.2 "simply complex" table tests (was Re: Table accessibility ) Steven Faulkner
Re: headers attribute Thomas Broyer
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Anne van Kesteren
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> liorean
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Anne van Kesteren
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Anne van Kesteren
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal

Sunday, 3 June 2007

Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Steve Faulkner

Monday, 4 June 2007

Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Philip & Le Khanh
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Karl Dubost
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Karl Dubost
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 3 June 2007

Re: headers attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Henrik Dvergsdal
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? Boris Zbarsky
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: headers attribute Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Steven Faulkner
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Henri Sivonen
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Steven Faulkner
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Steven Faulkner
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Henri Sivonen
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Bill Mason

Saturday, 2 June 2007

Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Schalk Neethling
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) aurélien levy
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Leif Halvard Silli
Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Laura Carlson
Re: headers attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: headers attribute Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> liorean
Re: Some DOM related comments liorean
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Lachlan Hunt
Re: Some DOM related comments Cameron McCormack
Some DOM related comments liorean
Re: headers attribute Leif Halvard Silli
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Ian Hickson
Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions) Jonas Sicking
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Dan Connolly
toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) Dan Connolly

Friday, 1 June 2007

Re: Complex Table Examples Laura Carlson
Re: Complex Table Examples Laura Carlson
Re: Complex Table Examples Laura Carlson
Problem in algorithm "get an attribute" of 8.2.2. The input stream Raphael Champeimont (Almacha)
Re: headers attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> Olivier GENDRIN
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Bill Mason
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Leif Halvard Silli
Re: 'role' should be property Jon Barnett
Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them Ian Hickson
Re: 'role' should be property Leif Halvard Silli
Re: 'role' should be property Jon Barnett
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) Sander Tekelenburg

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 22:10:17 UTC