- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:04:10 +0200
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > ... > I think we'll just have to use the name "XHTML" and the XHTML namespace > and have this eventually settled by the Director. Given statements like > the below, reasoned discussion seems unlikely to be productive: > > "Mark: I don't see why they need two names. They have HTML5, with two > serializations. No need for two names." > > "Rich: All existing XHTMLs have been modular, and HTML5 is not. It's a > mess." > > "Steven: I believe that XHTML2 is more backwards compatible than HTML5, > and I plan to make a document comparing them to demonstrate it." > ... Of these three, I find the last one *is* productive. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 12:04:29 UTC