- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 21:30:07 -0500
- To: Debi Orton <oradnio@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 18:22 -0400, Debi Orton wrote: [...] > Hi Dan, > > I assumed that the tutorial writing could not start in earnest until > we had reached agreement on the specification. Otherwise, writing a > tutorial would be like trying to fork jello. > > Because of that, I volunteered/signed up to review a few sections of > the proposed specification while waiting. [...] > If you would prefer that I work on writing tutorials BEFORE we have > an agreed-upon specification, I can drop my review and start tutorial > work on whatever section you'd like me to start on. Ah... good question... let's see... it looks like you're aiming to finish some amount of review by 2007-06-30. Go ahead and focus on review until then. I get the impression the tutorial stuff can easily wait a couple weeks. As to forking jello, again, I don't see it that way. Concurrent iteration may seem like chaos, but I think it's actually a pretty good process. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 02:30:13 UTC