- From: Tom Morris <bbtommorris@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:44:56 +0100
- To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 6/23/07, Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com> wrote: > HTML-XML5 > > This is using the same theory behind naming FTPS and SFTP, where both > are two different systems. > The RDF community has had a similar issue since RDF can be serialized in a number of ways. Hence RDF/XML, RDF/N3, RDF/Turtle and RDF/TriX... On that basis, why not 'HTML/XML 5' for the XML serialization and 'HTML 5' for the non-XML serialization? Since the HTML 5 specification currently discourages authors from using the XML serialization, it would make little practical difference to the page author whether it's called XHTML5 or HTML/XML 5. It would help prevent confusion with the W3C's XHTML 1.0/1.1/2.0 effort though. -- Tom Morris http://tom.opiumfield.com/blog/
Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 20:45:01 UTC