- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:19:49 +0900
- To: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Le 19 juin 2007 à 07:18, Philip & Le Khanh a écrit :
> the HTML 5 project is setting out to design
> both a language (well, a dialect really) /and/ to define browser
> behaviour within a single specification. As a result, it is
> frequently unclear whether a suggestion is aimed at the language
> definition or at the browser behaviour specification. Both are
> equally important, but tolerance in the latter does not imply
> (or require) lack of rigour in the former.
Agreed, though that could be solved, I guess.
By working out a detailed tutorial of the semantics of the spec.
Or let's say to make it more obvious:
* HTML 5 semantics specification.
* HTML 5 implementation guide.
Both are very useful.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 00:20:17 UTC