- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:31:06 -0500
- To: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:19 +0200, Martijn wrote: > 2007/6/25, Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>: > > Ok, where should I post this then? > > Ok, Anne clarified to me offlist. > I still think a proper bug tracking system is the way to go. This rant applies to "I prefer X" messages about as much as "we need X" messages... <rant> Saying "we need X" as though we're a bunch of customers who can demand service annoys me. We are the working group. If we want work done, the most constructive thing is to do it. </rant> Is it really worth sending a message that says only "I prefer X" to 400+ inboxes? If the message elaborated as to _why_ you prefer X, it might at least give some useful information to people who are doing some work. I started with http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 ; I still find it useful for my own purposes, but a lot more work is going into the wiki issues list http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML , so I'm OK with using that too, for a while at least. Some work was done toward using bugzilla (some consider that a "proper bug tracking system") but I haven't seen much investment in that direction since Terje set it up ion 14 May. For details, see http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/IssueTrackerRequirements -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 15:31:23 UTC