- From: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:07:24 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
>> - dt/dd need a reel relationship like the for attribut on label >> mechanism > Why is there a need for this? The specification defines exactly what > the relationship is between them. Much like HTML4 did. because actually i can do : <dl> <dt> 1st terme </dt> <dd> 1st terme description </dd> <dd> 2nd terme description </dd> <dt> 2nd terme </dt> <dt> 3rd terme</dt> <dd> 3rd terme description</dd> </dl> with no way for AT to know that 2nd terme description is actually the 2nd terme description and not the second description of the first terme >> - actually their is no fallback content for embed element > Why is that needed for plugins? maybe i misunderstand the function of the embed element. Is this just a way to link to the plugins ? or a way to use it to show some content like the object element >> - the only fallback content for iframe elements is pure text, i think >> we need to authorize an "a" element to link to the content of the iframe > Doesn't the <iframe> do that already? I'm not sure <iframe> needs > "fallback" content at all. I don't know if all UA do that but it's not the actual spec http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/present/frames.html#edef-IFRAME If all the UA do that, it's no enough to just say there is no need to author fallback, i think we need to say that this fallback content is given by the UA with something like IFRAME: "content of the src attribut on the iframe element"
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2007 15:07:43 UTC