- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:00:16 +0200
- To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:34 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal
<henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote:
> I wonder if there are any guidelines for such reviews.
>
> Wouldn't it be useful to have a common set of questions and/or other
> types of clues towards what we should look for?
I think in general different people look for different things. However,
here are some ideas:
* Is the text understandable
- If not, how can it be improved?
* Is it implementable?
- Does the algorithm lead to endless loops?
- Does the algorithm cause existing web sites to break?
* Is there room for improvement?
- If so, what can be improved?
> Or maybe we should just review against the design principles?
That would make sense too.
> I'm also a bit curious about what constitutes a "section".
>
> Should we just follow the divisions in
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/?
I think that's mostly up to your own judgement. Just indicate which
features you have reviewed and maybe point out where they can be found.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 12:00:28 UTC