- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:00:16 +0200
- To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:34 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote: > I wonder if there are any guidelines for such reviews. > > Wouldn't it be useful to have a common set of questions and/or other > types of clues towards what we should look for? I think in general different people look for different things. However, here are some ideas: * Is the text understandable - If not, how can it be improved? * Is it implementable? - Does the algorithm lead to endless loops? - Does the algorithm cause existing web sites to break? * Is there room for improvement? - If so, what can be improved? > Or maybe we should just review against the design principles? That would make sense too. > I'm also a bit curious about what constitutes a "section". > > Should we just follow the divisions in > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/? I think that's mostly up to your own judgement. Just indicate which features you have reviewed and maybe point out where they can be found. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 12:00:28 UTC