- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:41:07 +0200
- To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 13:15:27 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote: > I think we will gain precision by using consistent, spec-wide > terminology to distinguish between DOM attributes and attributes defined > on elements (reflected by the DOM Attr interface). The spec uses (at > least) three different terms for the latter: > > "attribute" > "content attribute" > "element attribute" > > IMO "element attribute" is the most unambiguous and descriptive > alternative. At least, simply using "attribute" should be avoided. Where does it use "element attribute"? That sounds like it might be a bug. The specification claims it uses "content attribute" unless the use of "attribute" is not ambiguous. I have found no real problems with that so far... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 11:41:12 UTC