- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:36:36 -0500
- To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
A few more items for consideration: - Consider clarifying what "TAG" means in the introduction by saying "Technical Architecture Group (TAG)" or using the <abbr> element. Linking to the findings would be helpful too so folks don't have to search for them. - In section 2.1. consider changing "browsers" to "user agents". Not everyone uses a browser. http://www.w3.org/2002/10/uaag10-faq/#ua-def - In section 3.4, what is the logic behind saying "when possible" in the statement, "Design features for universal access. This does not mean that features should be omitted entirely if not all users can fully make use of them, but alternate mechanisms should be provided when possible." ? The HTML 5 working group charter, says "The HTML Working Group will cooperate with the Web Accessibility Initiative to ensure that the deliverables _will satisfy accessibility requirements_." - In section 3.7 the example "The b and i elements are widely used" is based on the disputed "cow paths" principle. Consider removing it. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdesign/
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 12:36:46 UTC