- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 14:03:53 +0100
- To: "aurélien levy" <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
- Message-ID: <55687cf80706030603r18ae4868t2a3504f5f8f5dc9f@mail.gmail.com>
Hi aurélien, could you add two more versions of the juicy studio table. 1. with scope, but no id/headers 2. no scope or id/headers used. thanks. I will then test them using JAWS and Window Eyes and post the results. On 03/06/07, aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr> wrote: > > > Hi, > > actually i think the case "complex table with th and scope" can achieved > that, > but i had just updated with the juicystudio exemple to be sure to test > this case. > http://www.fairytells.net/table_test_case/ > > One more interrogation, did we need to test the use of thead, > tbody,tfoot element ? > > Aurélien > > Hi Aurélien, > > > > These test cases are a good start, what is also needed are some tables > > that test the limits of the scope attribute, ie. > > a table where the headers cannot be unambiguously defined using the > scope > > attribute, but can be using id/headers > > attributes. Then these can be tested using screen readers, to see if the > headers can be interrogated successfully > > in either table. > > > > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Received on Sunday, 3 June 2007 13:03:57 UTC