volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail?

We now have some movement on spec review and issue
tracking with http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/IssueTableHeaders ,
for example.

The in-progress results of the "What should we publish first?" survey
suggest that design principles are just as urgent/important as the spec.
More on those separately...

I'm interested in something of a review schedule for the HTML 5
spec itself. I'd like at least two people to do thorough reviews
of each section of the spec, and send their comments for discussion
in the WG, with the goal of summaries like IssueTableHeaders
for important issues.

In order to get a sense of timing, I'd like specific people
to volunteer for specific sections and give a date by which
you think you can deliver detailed review comments.

Please use the tasks survey.

As a reminder, the following people indicated interest
in this task to date:

detailed review of substantial sections of spec
     1. Jonas Sicking 
     2. Murray Maloney 
     3. Ryan King 
     4. Debi Orton 
     5. Simon Pieters 
     6. Anne van Kesteren 
     7. Henri Sivonen 
     8. Asbjørn Ulsberg 
     9. Geoffrey Sneddon 
    10. David Håsäther 
    11. Sander van Lambalgen 
    12. Laurens Holst 
    13. John-Mark Bell 
    14. Darren West 
    15. Maciej Stachowiak 
    16. Andrew Neitsch 
    17. Ian Hickson 
    18. Mikko Honkala 
    19. Thomas Higginbotham 
    20. David Hyatt 
    21. Serdar Kiliç 
    22. Isac Lagerblad 
    23. Patrick Taylor 
    24. Roman Kitainik 
    25. Matthew Wilcox 
    26. Craig Saila 
    27. Karl Dubost 
    28. Jens Meiert 
    29. Shawn Medero 
    30. Thomas Bradley 

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Thursday, 7 June 2007 16:25:22 UTC