Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element...

Le 26 juin 2007 à 21:11, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> 0.2% of the pages out there use the <image> element per some non- 
> scientific study Hixie did for Google in 2005-12. You can read that  
> in the source code of the HTML5 specification that handles <image>.  
> What pages "assume" is hard to measure. However, given that all  
> browsers support this quirk I suppose it's necessary.

Is there an interop table  for the "image" element?
Which user agents support it?

Karl Dubost -
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog -
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 01:45:13 UTC