- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:25:09 -0500
- To: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Laurens Holst wrote: > Let me quote the entirety that came before this: Thank you for doing that! >>> So if an image is moved in the DOM it doesn't get the new URI, is >>> what you're saying? ... >> Sure, I guess it’s odd, but that’s what I’ve been talking about. UAs >> already do it with <base> in HTML, and Firefox with xml:base in XHTML >> as well. As a matter of fact, if the base URI changes when you move an image in the DOM in Firefox due to a different xml:base up the new parent chain, it _will_ load the new image. That was the part I was disagreeing with. -Boris
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 03:25:37 UTC