- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:20:55 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:13:49 +0200, Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/18/07, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> Oh I'd be happy to publish a snapshot to http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/, >> but that wasn't what was being requested. > > Yes, please. That would be awesome. Seconded. Various stakeholders in the Web are slow to grasp the lightweight public development model. Others find working in English difficult. Both of these groups are often much better able to contribute usefully through a more structured process of releasing drafts from time to time, making proposals based on those drafts, and seeing a new draft some time later. Getting that to happen before last call is a good way of avoiding the endless last calls that can otherwise sap the energy of a group and of the editors. There is no reason why we can't have the best of both worlds. If a comment comes on a 3-monthly TR draft that has been superseded by 30 every-other-daily editor's drafts, it will not necessarily have been rendered irrelevant. And tracking changes across the TR drafts via a list of changes made, rather than relying on people following the firehose of information that the constant improvement cycle provides, is actually more helpful for many of those people. This is actually a specific request I have received from several partners in Asia, who imagine that I have some influence over the process. I think it makes sense, and except for the chore of making the change list between each TR draft, which is a relatively small amount of additional work, I think the overhead is almost negligible and the value is large. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 23:21:09 UTC