- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:21:16 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote: > > It is true that applications don't tell attributes to be in specific > states. States only exist in the specification. That's where we "tell" > about states. Applications "tell" concrete attributes to be set to > concrete values, or to not exist at all. They don't deal with states at > all. Furthermore we cannot deprive attributes of being in states. An > attribute cannot not be in a state. As long as it is known, it will > allways be in some state, even if it doesn't physically exist and even > if we haven't given that state a particular name and significance. This discussion has become far too philosophical. At the end of the day I still don't understand what is wrong with the use of the word "default". I don't think it does any harm. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 18:21:38 UTC