- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:36:30 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org, connolly@w3.org, "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
Dan Connolly sez: "However, it is not constructive is to continue to discuss matters that the Working Group has resolved..." If the matters are still being discussed, they have NOT been resolved. Further Dan sez: "And since by your own admission you have already presented this information, it is not new and it is out of order." "this information" like everything else at the event level changes over time and under new circumstances, including arbitrary chair decisions, thus any different approach to said info IS new and if it can be ruled out of order, we're missing the whole point of having consensus-seeking procedures. Love.
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 19:36:46 UTC