- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:33:31 +0200
- To: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
liorean schrieb: > > On 03/06/07, Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote: >> Better use IDs then, e.g. <elm id="scope.identifier.string">. That will >> make converting a 'scoped' stylesheet also a lot easier, as it's just a >> matter of prefixing all selectors in the scoped stylesheet with >> #{@scope}. > > True. However, I just chimed in to make sure that the third proposal > wasn't left out of the discussion, since Karl obviously didn't list > that suggestion. > > I would personally prefer the following-siblings-only scoping proposal > to be what we specify, possibly together with a new ::scopeRoot > pseudo-element that encompasses all those siblings. I'd prefer a :scope-root pseudo-class, applying to the parent node. Creating a magic range sounds like unneeded complication to me. --Dao
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 11:33:46 UTC