- From: Dão Gottwald <dao@design-noir.de>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:33:31 +0200
- To: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
liorean schrieb:
>
> On 03/06/07, Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl> wrote:
>> Better use IDs then, e.g. <elm id="scope.identifier.string">. That will
>> make converting a 'scoped' stylesheet also a lot easier, as it's just a
>> matter of prefixing all selectors in the scoped stylesheet with
>> #{@scope}.
>
> True. However, I just chimed in to make sure that the third proposal
> wasn't left out of the discussion, since Karl obviously didn't list
> that suggestion.
>
> I would personally prefer the following-siblings-only scoping proposal
> to be what we specify, possibly together with a new ::scopeRoot
> pseudo-element that encompasses all those siblings.
I'd prefer a :scope-root pseudo-class, applying to the parent node.
Creating a magic range sounds like unneeded complication to me.
--Dao
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 11:33:46 UTC