Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head>

liorean schrieb:
> On 03/06/07, Laurens Holst <> wrote:
>> Better use IDs then, e.g. <elm id="scope.identifier.string">. That will
>> make converting a 'scoped' stylesheet also a lot easier, as it's just a
>> matter of prefixing all selectors in the scoped stylesheet with 
>> #{@scope}.
> True. However, I just chimed in to make sure that the third proposal
> wasn't left out of the discussion, since Karl obviously didn't list
> that suggestion.
> I would personally prefer the following-siblings-only scoping proposal
> to be what we specify, possibly together with a new ::scopeRoot
> pseudo-element that encompasses all those siblings.

I'd prefer a :scope-root pseudo-class, applying to the parent node. 
Creating a magic range sounds like unneeded complication to me.


Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 11:33:46 UTC