- From: Dylan Smith <qstage@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:44:19 -0700
- To: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <sebastian@dreamlab.net>, <public-html@w3.org>
on 6/26/07 3:24 PM, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer at sebastian@dreamlab.net wrote: > > > ... because it violates the principle > of cognitive dissonance. Things that > are different should be named different. > XHTML 2 and XHTML 5 are two totally > different animals, whilst the outside > impression would be that XHTML 5 > is the successor of XHTML 2, which > isn't the case since its a fork. > > Use case: Common Sense. > > Will result in: Even More Confusion. > > Suggestion: Rename XHTML 5 into > something different. > > - Sebastian > > +1
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 23:42:27 UTC