- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:29:15 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 16:18 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I drafted up a document that lists the differences from HTML4: > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/html5/html4-differences/Overview.html > > Feedback is welcome on the document itself. Very nice. The first sentence seems to be disconnected from the rest of the document: | HTML5 is different from HTML4 in a way that it addresses both | document and application semantics making it more suitable for | the web applications created today. Can you help me see how that relates to any of the specific HTML4/HTML5 differences? I did some noodling on opening paragraphs, and this is what I came up with... it's still a little redundant and needs polish, but... what do you think? [[ HTML has been in continuous evolution since it was introduced to the Internet in the early 1990's. Some features were introduced in specifications; others were introduced in software releases. In some respects, implementations and author practices have converged with each other and with specifications and standards, but in other ways, they continue to diverge. HTML 4 became a W3C Recommendation in 1997. While it continues to serve as a rough guide to many of the core features of HTML, it does not provide enough information to build implementations that interoperate with a critical mass of deployed content. The HTML5 draft reflects an effort, started in 2004, to study contemporary HTML implementations and deployed content and (1) specify enough detail to promote interoperable implementations (2) standardize markup for emerging idioms HTML 4 is specified in terms of SGML, but influential implementations started with ad-hoc parsers and evolved in tandem with author practices. Inspired by the forward compatible error handling in CSS, HTML5 defines detailed processing models where necessary to ensure that implementations become interoperable and that the language stays extensible in the future. ]] p.s. I'm happy to commit this edit, or something close to it, if you like. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 23:30:02 UTC