- From: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:33:11 +0200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 4 Jun 2007, at 15:33, James Graham wrote: > A link to a page that has to work around the lack of a feature in > some sub-optimal way is a perfect example of how it would "Solve > Real Problems". Indeed if you are unable to find such a link you > will have to work much harder to convince people that the problem > being solved is indeed real. Also, it is very important to > understand how proposed features interact with legacy browsers so > having test documents that use the proposed feature is very valuble. Sure. I agree on all of that. I also think that this should be the major approach and that this type of research is extremely important. But I think there should also be some room for activism and creative thinking. And I think it should be possible to take projections of future developments into account - even if it's not a problem on the current web. -- Henrik
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 14:33:26 UTC