- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:48:48 -0500
- To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 6/25/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > The working group has agreed to use the text of the HTML 5 spec > for review, but we haven't made any decisions about language itself. >From 'Results of Questionnaire Shall we Adopt HTML5 as our specification text for review?' [1] "A 'yes' response indicates a willingness to use these documents as the basis for discussion with the editors and the WG going forward. It does not constitute endorsement of the entire feature set specified in these documents, nor does it indicate that you feel that the documents in their present state should become a W3C Recommendation or even a W3C Working Draft." Results: yes 88 no 4 concur 7 abstain 3 I don't 'think' anyone registered a formal objection. [2] Or did they? [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#Consensus Laura -- Laura L. Carlson http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdesign/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 22:48:53 UTC