Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)

On 4 Jun 2007, at 11:58, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> I don't think we should assume HTML4 is perfect. The legacy we have  
> is HTML as practiced on the web, not HTML4. It probably make sense  
> to analyse features in that light (apart from normally reviewing  
> them).

I agree

But if we are to follow this literally, we must, at least in  
principle, be able to state the rationale behind *every single  
feature* in HTML5 with use cases, research etc. referring to actual  
usage in the wild. If not, what parts of the spec can safely be  
excluded from such scrutiny?


Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 10:38:58 UTC