- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:56:51 +0200
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, "Craig Francis" <craig@synergycms.com>
- Cc: Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo <amla70@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:15:01 +0200, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > Also sprach Craig Francis: > The style element, when scoped to its parent, will be able to do this > -- and more -- but it is more verbose. The problem with the style= attribute, as opposed to the <style> element. Is that it encourages media specific style sheets. As the media for the style= attribute is automatically "all". It also does not allow for alternate style sheets. The <style> element in HTML5 handles both. Having said that, I don't really care strongly either way. > Finally, there's much content out there that uses the 'style' > attribute and the cost of keeping it is lower than the cost of > removing it. User agents will be required to support it. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 09:57:23 UTC