- From: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:10:12 +0200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 4 Jun 2007, at 12:43, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> But if we are to follow this literally, we must, at least in >> principle, be able to state the rationale behind *every single >> feature* in HTML5 with use cases, research etc. referring to >> actual usage in the wild. If not, what parts of the spec can >> safely be excluded from such scrutiny? > > Indeed. Rationale can be mostly found in the WHATWG mailing list > archives. It has been said multiple times on this list already that > somebody problably has to volunteer and collect it on a wiki if > they want it in a more accessible format. And what if the rationale and the pros/cons pertaining to a particular construct or modification cannot be found anywhere? Should it still be left in the spec? -- Henrik
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 11:31:53 UTC