Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) from Jirka Kosek on 2007-06-22 (public-html@w3.org from June 2007)

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:02:26 +0200
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>, "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <467B8212.8040405@kosek.cz>

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

>> I would imagine the reaction of the XHTML2 WG is more to the name
>> XHTML5 that would have the effect (whether intended or not) of making
>> XHTML2 seem obsoleted. XHTML1.5 would get around that (while still
>> providing a link to HTML something like java 1.2/ J2EE 2).
> 
> I'd love to hear an official statement from the XHTML2 WG to that effect.

Me too. But before asking we probably should make sure that members of
out WG will be happy with XHTML1.5.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------
Be in, register for XML Prague 2007 today! http://www.xmlprague.cz

Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 08:02:12 UTC