- From: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:20:38 +0100
- To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:02:42 +0100, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote: > 4) for all of the dropped attributes, we need to immediately explain > what the alternatives authors will use (e.g., accesskey, td@scope). > > 5) the 'style' attribute issue just raised will cause great concern in > the population we release this to. Heavy-handed moves like that will > create a bad name for HTML5 before we can even get some consensus > amongst ourselves. I agree. I was about to raise an issue about lack of rationale for dropping accesskey (which BTW I think should be limited to digits only rather than being dropped). Perhaps this document should omit elements/attributes that are still disputed or mark on which there isn't a final decision yet. -- regards, Kornel Lesinski
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 20:21:00 UTC