- From: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:30:58 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
Karl Dubost wrote: > about http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML > > Le 2 juin 2007 à 09:20, Dan Connolly a écrit : >> I see "Italicised issues are those that have been marked as resolved." > > I'm not very fond of this. > I would prefer a marker at the beginning of the sentence, for example: > RESOLVED > > italics is not necessary obvious and may cause accessibility issues if > people have different stylesheets. Indeed : particularly as the first instance of "italicised text" (and quite possibly all) is in fact tagged as an <em> element and not an <i> : > <em> > Italicised issues are those that have been marked as > resolved by someone (e.g. you, if you found a duplicate > issue, or if you have found the issue is already resolved > in the specification). > </em> > > ... > > <em> > <a class="http" href="http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/RichTextInput03"> > Rich text input controls > </a> > </em> > > ........ > > [Rich text input controls] State: RESOLVED. HTML5 has contenteditable="" for this. Philip Taylor
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 07:32:53 UTC