- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:13:00 +0200
- To: "Adam Nash" <adamn@wirespring.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:29:31 +0200, Adam Nash <adamn@wirespring.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 June 2007 01:09 pm, Dan Connolly wrote:
>> Shall we release HTML 5 differences from HTML 4 as a W3C Working Draft?
>> Specifically, version 1.25 2007/06/25 14:50:30 plus any
>> publication-related changes (e.g. status section, typos, broken links)
>
> Section 2, third paragraph. This sentence is missing the word "with".
> "This syntax is compatible XHTML1 documents and XHTML1 implementations."
Fixed (local copy).
> In the same section, I would suggest adding to the two syntax examples an
> instance of an empty element, say, <img>. This would demonstrate the XML
> empty-element syntax, which isn't used in the HTML syntax (at least, I
> assume the syntaxes work like that).
Actually,
1. <br>, <br/> and <br /> are all legal in the HTML syntax of HTML5 as
long
as the element is a "void element";
2. The <meta> element uses your suggested syntax already.
> This second suggestion is probably more substantive than
> "publication-related
> changes" but I do not object to publishing the draft without the change.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 09:13:17 UTC