- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:17:23 +0900
- To: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
Le 22 juin 2007 à 05:26, Ian Hickson a écrit : > What help is it to tell the author > that his misguided (but previously compliant) use of the compact="" > attribute on the <ul> element is still compliant, when almost no > browser > implements it and when it's been dropped from the specs? And what is happening when someone looks at HTML 4.01 Specification and thinks, I want to create a product which implements this feature. Or I want to create a converter which helps me to move my document from version X to version Y. Here you are forgetting that some people have written documents knowing what they were doing. > Whether historical documents are compliant to their contemporary > versions > of the specs is of academic interest only. What matters is whether > they > are compliant _today_. This is where part of the conflict lies. * Some people will see from a document perspective * Some people will see from an application perspective. Weaving a metaphor. Document perspective: A document written by Shakespeare has a version number. It is call the date and the cultural location. It has been written. Part of the language written inside is understandable only because you have a dictionary (or knowledge) of that time. Because semantics and usage of words evolve. Application perspective: This same document by Shakespeare has been written with characters, I guess first on paper with ink and hand-written. With a series of discussion with the publisher, it finally came into a more formatted version (print characters) which makes it easier to read and reproduce for people who are not in contact with Shakespeare. Today the application have changed from block letters, to laser printing, to digital consumption. The same text is still *readable* (application) because of the block letters codification BUT it is not necessary *understandable* (document) if you don't have the appropriate dictionary of this time (version). -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 02:17:29 UTC