Re: fear of "invisible metadata"

On 6/25/07, Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you want to replace <img> with something that accepts fallback content,
> then <object> is what you're looking for. It already works in several
> browsers.
>

isn't it also how it's supposed to be done in XHTML2?
anyways, I personally prefer keeping the <img> tag around instead of
having a universal <object> tag needing extra attributes to describe
its contents. (my best guess is that the <video> and <audio> tags were
created to solve this problem, let's not go backwards on the issue)