- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:42:34 +0200
- To: "Sean Owen" <srowen@google.com>, "Laurens Holst" <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:30:50 +0200, Sean Owen <srowen@google.com> wrote: > One sub-point I'd like to make is that it's not wrong for the user > agent to say nothing about what it accepts. It's also not wrong to > list everything it accepts every time, according to HTTP. If a request > for a CSS file retrieves a text/html document, well, sounds like the > site is quite broken. This is not a user agent problem. I think I interpret this rather different from you. That is, the user agent indicates which types it supports for a particular request. So if it says text/html when it fetches a style sheet it indicates it can process text/html as a style sheet for the current page. Or if it fetches an image that it can show text/html resources as images. On another point, Content-Type of the response for both image and style sheet requests is simply ignored. The image type is determined through sniffing and in case of a linked style sheet it is simply parsed as CSS. This is more or less required for user agents if they want to support web pages out there. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 07:42:52 UTC