- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:57:16 +0200
- To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:40:27 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote: > I've seen a several dismissive remarks on adding a <picture> element in > the HTML5 discussions. However, the need for a new embedded element with > fallback content for still images is far more important than adding > <video> and <audio>. I'm not saying I'm against those new elements, but > the need for them is far less than for a new embedded content element > with fallback for still images. What are you basing this statement on, exactly? Also, introducing a new container for images has been tried before and it didn't really work out so well although support for <object> is improving. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2007 12:57:27 UTC