- From: Kornel Lesinski <kornel@geekhood.net>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:59:51 +0100
- To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
I'm in favor of calling it XHTML1.5. My reasons: * XML serialization of HTML5 seems to be logical continuation of XHTML/1.x. * It would be baffling if W3C's language, that's compatible with XHTML/1.x, uses XHTML namespace and has every document containing 'xhtml', was in fact called something else. * I don't think there's a need to develop HTML4-based XHTML up to version 1.5, so this shouldn't interfere with XHTML WG's naming scheme. * 1.5 version rightly places it as successor to XHTML/1.1 and not XHTML/2. * 1.x naming scheme could be continued in parallel with HTML versions without making XHTML/2 look out-of-order. -- regards, Kornel Lesinski
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 10:59:58 UTC