- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:39:05 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
At 16:07 -0500 UTC, on 2007-06-26, Robert Burns wrote: > On Jun 26, 2007, at 3:33 PM, Monika Trebo wrote: > >> ... difference between @alt and @title [...] > What's your view on the issue of adding @alt to the other embedded > content elements (<object>, <video>, <audio>, etc.). <object>, <video>, <audio> are contrainers. The only reason <img> has an alt attribute is that it needs one because, unfortunately, it is not a container. > It strikes me > that the same usefulness that @alt brings to <img> it would also > bring to these other elements. How? Why would <video alt="textual alternative"/> be more useful than <video>textual alternative</video>? -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 11:41:52 UTC