Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name...

Le 27 juin 2007 à 09:01, Arun a écrit :
> If someone comes up with a great proposal, I'm all for it, but I'm  
> not terribly worried about confusion yet (speaking on behalf of a  
> company that authors web pages).  A strawman might be "HTML5 as  
> XML" (since when we use that, we're supposed to use a strict  
> mimetype anyway).

html5x
html5/xml
html5 as xml

far stretched and changing the name totally. hawt = hypertext  
applications with web technologies: xhawt (hawt/xhawt -> hot/shot)


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 00:38:30 UTC