- From: Daniel Schattenkirchner <schattenkirchner.daniel@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:21:37 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
aurélien levy schrieb:
> At least we need to add an explicit rule to say in semantical meaning
> dt should always be followed by his associated dd. But the proposed :
> <dl>
> <li>
> <dt></dt>
> <dd></dd>
> </li>
> </dl>
> is far better since i can do want i want with the order of dt and dd
> and still have association between them
I think XHTML 2 has <di> ("definition item", could also be "dialog item"
for the new dialog-element). This is better than <li> because it is an
yet unknown element and should not cause any problems in legacy UAs.
I'd like to add that in case <di> gets specced by this group <dl> should
only have di *or* dt/dd as child-elements and not di and dd/dt at the
same time (similar to the stricter content model). Well, in case it's
not ok to have
<dl>
<di>
<dt></dt>
<dd></dd>
</di>
<dt></dt>
<dd></dd>
</dl>
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2007 17:21:42 UTC