Re: html 5 and accessibility issue

aurélien levy schrieb:
> At least we need to add an explicit rule to say in semantical meaning 
> dt should always be followed by his associated dd. But the proposed :
> <dl>
>    <li>
>        <dt></dt>
>        <dd></dd>
>    </li>
> </dl>
> is far better since i can do want i want with the order of dt and dd 
> and still have association between them
I think XHTML 2 has <di> ("definition item", could also be "dialog item" 
for the new dialog-element). This is better than <li> because it is an 
yet unknown element and should not cause any problems in legacy UAs.

I'd like to add that in case <di> gets specced by this group <dl> should 
only have di *or* dt/dd as child-elements and not di and dd/dt at the 
same time (similar to the stricter content model). Well, in case it's 
not ok to have

Received on Saturday, 30 June 2007 17:21:42 UTC