- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:15:33 -0700
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6CE65BCE-7DB6-4C73-ADC1-B4EC738CC697@apple.com>
On Jun 3, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote: > >What bothers me about this thread is that so far the cases to test > >lack the most obvious case: A table where the table headers are > >marked up as <th> with no scope='' or headers='' anywhere. > > if you look at aurélien's test cases [http://www.fairytells.net/ > table_test_case/ ] there is a simple table with only th elements > > >To me, it seems like a no-brainer that for practical usefulness, a > screen reader should walk tables like this in the absence of > explicit >association. > and indeed certain screen readers such as JAWS and Window Eyes do. > But in cases where multiple levels of headers on multiple axes > occur simple "table walking" will not suffice. The associations > need to be explicitly defined. > > >(I tried to test this in VoiceOver, but I couldn't find documentation > >about keyboard commands querying a table cell for its headers.) > > Using voiceover as an example of a screen reader is not necessarily > a good idea, as most vision impaired users use JAWS or Window Eyes > on a PC and voiceover support for HTML is rudimentary compared to > JAWS and Window Eyes. I agree that VoiceOver is less advanced in its HTML support. But it is also the only real option on Mac OS X currently, so worth testing in addition to the others IMO. In particular, I don't think it has any support for matching up table headers yet. Regards, Maciej
Received on Sunday, 3 June 2007 23:15:56 UTC