- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 22:56:19 +1000
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Robert Burns wrote: > I've seen a several dismissive remarks on adding a <picture> element in > the HTML5 discussions. However, the need for a new embedded element with > fallback content for still images is far more important than adding > <video> and <audio>. That's because fixing the existing <object> element, which at least already works in some UAs, provides a much better solution than introducing a new element that doesn't work in any UA. <object data="image">fallback</object> is equivalent to the <picture> idea. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2007 12:56:28 UTC