Re: fear of "invisible metadata"

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:07:47 +0200, Philip & Le Khanh <> wrote:
>> Joshue O Connor wrote:
>>> The problem that you seem be indicating is the difficulty in writing *good* alt text. This is an entirely different issue but an
>>> important one. The best the WG can do is provide tools that make
>>> this easy
>> What sort of "tools" did you have in mind ?
> Attributes and elements - which are all that this group makes :) 

Philip, as Chaals says - attributes and elements. And in many ways all
we need are the correct, supported, and backwards compatible attributes
and elements. (Copy, paste and repeat this mantra ad nauseum.)

> But attributes and elements don't "make [writing *good* alt text] easy",
> which is what Joshue is referring to, and the reason for my (genuine)
> question to him. 

I appreciate that you are making a genuine inquiry and I will try and
give a genuine answer, which is that it actually *isn't* easy. Writing
good appropriate and meaningful alt text (when required) really is a
particular skill that is acquired over time and improves over time. It
really requires thought and patience etc.  For some, this is a real
stumbling block to other automated processing of data  as it requires
human intervention.

In many ways no matter what @future_attribute/elements the WG comes up
with, it will more than likely still be time consuming, difficult etc.
There is however work being done by others (in HCI circles, I have a
colleague in Dublin who is looking at this) into sophisticated pattern
recognition in order to automatically tag images with appropriate meta
data for classification and archiving purposes - that could help
automate (or assist) in the future. Not doubt these techniques will
become more sophisticated as time goes on.


Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 08:57:05 UTC