- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:06:55 +0200
- To: "Tom Morris" <bbtommorris@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:44:56 +0200, Tom Morris <bbtommorris@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/23/07, Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com> wrote: >> HTML-XML5 >> >> This is using the same theory behind naming FTPS and SFTP, where both >> are two different systems. >> > > The RDF community has had a similar issue since RDF can be serialized > in a number of ways. Hence RDF/XML, RDF/N3, RDF/Turtle and RDF/TriX... > > On that basis, why not 'HTML/XML 5' for the XML serialization and Because somebody would start wondering when the HTML WG started re-designing XML, and why. HTML5/XML makes sense though. just 2 cents worth chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 00:07:06 UTC