Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required

> > > > We should probably add an explanation for the doctype
> > > > simplification in the HTML 4 differences document as well.
> 
> It says a DOCTYPE is only useful for triggering standards mode. It
> points to a document that says the same and elaborates on that point
> a lot. What else do you want it to say?

I /propose/ to add one, two sentences /why/ the Doctype has been simplified, in a document that is indeed targeting HTML 4 /differences/, but is /probably/ not damaged by adding short explanations of key concepts.

If that suggestion doesn't reach consensus, fine.

-- 
Jens Meiert
http://meiert.com/en/

Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 08:44:14 UTC