- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:36:47 +0200
- To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: "aurelien levy" <levy@tektonika.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:28:58 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote: > On Jun 30, 2007, at 9:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:53:39 +0200, aurelien levy <levy@tektonika.com> >> wrote: >>> - actually their is no fallback content for embed element >> >> Why is that needed for plugins? > > That's when fallback content is needed: for non-text media (that is > sometimes serviced through plug-ins). Isn't that a problem with the plugin? > [...] > > However, if it said that the type of the iframe @src had to begin with > "text/ or "application/xml" then that might be sufficient. Simply > saying a browser context could lead authors to think a direct @src link > to an image or other non-text media was allowed (even PDF or Flash might > require fallback content since those do not have the accessibility > capabilities of HTML). Well, yes, if you want to make things inaccessible you can do that. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2007 15:37:05 UTC