- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:06:54 -0500
- To: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, scott lewis <sfl@scotfl.ca>, wai-xtech@w3.org
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 22:50 +0100, Philip & Le Khanh wrote: > Dan -- > > > Unless you have new information sufficient to convince the > > chairs that the WG should re-consider the decision, it is > > out of order to discuss it. > > Since this ruling may affect more people than the one > to whom the message was specifically addressed, it > might be helpful if you referred the group to the > relevant part of "standing orders" in which guidance > on what is, and what is not, "out of order for discussion" > may be found. It's in the charter... "if a decision is necessary for timely progress, but after due consideration of different opinions, consensus is not achieved, the Chair should put a question (allowing for remote, asynchronous participation using, for example, email and/or web-based survey techniques) and record a decision and any objections, and consider the matter resolved, at least until new information becomes available." -- http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#decisions -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 23:07:05 UTC