- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:17:55 -0500
- To: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
In another thread, I see discussion of versioning that
seems to be starting from scratch.
Please let's take advantage of the discussion we've had
so far.
In the wiki issues list (http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML )
we seem to have a "DOCTYPEs and versioning" issue;
the wiki topic name seems a bit odd, but there it is:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/DocTypes02
I just spent a few minutes linking particularly relevant
messages:
[[
Noteable messages include the following (the arguments therein should be
abstracted above):
* Version information (was Re: HTML5 vs HTML6) L. David Baron Thu,
5 Apr 2007
* Versioning and html(5) from Chris Wilson 12 April; follow-up
from Henri Sivonen with test case.
* If we have versioning, it should be in an attribute, not the
doctype Maciej Stachowiak (Tuesday, 17 April)
* Re: HTML version issue summary? David Hyatt (Wednesday, 25
April)
]]
Please help abstract the arguments in these messages and
the threads that followed.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 17:18:03 UTC