- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:44:23 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 20:57 +0200, Olivier GENDRIN wrote: >> On 6/18/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: >>> The Working Group homepage [cut] has a >>> "Current and Upcoming Events" at the top, >> An no RSS feed for that. > > Are you interested to sketch how an RSS feed could work? > > I think Karl and colleagues have played with hAtom to Atom > and such; I think the technical issues are most likely > manageable... > > But I see editorial challenges... the items in the > current events section are bullet items, not complete > feed entries. I tweak them and smush them around, > and re-order them and such. I'd have to think about them > differently if every change caused a new item in > zillions of blog readers. Maybe that would be worthwhile; > I dunno. As long as atom:id and atom:updated have not changed, feed readers should not treat any tweaks, smushes, or re-ordering as significant. Some may anyway, but at that point, you've indicated your wishes. > Another option is a "planet HTML WG". I think Michael > Smith has been playing with that. Care to share details, > Michael? Both Planet 2.0 and Venus) are examples of software which handle atom:id and atom:updated correctly. - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 22:44:32 UTC